hello ppl. .
well dys in fact is mah first post as a blogger! so dont expect this to be a very good one. .
We come across so many people as well as things in our routine life. We also encounter differen situations, conditions and circumstances where in we tend to act/react to the best of our abilities.
Although that's an unconscious and an automatic attempt from us to respond to a certain encounter according to our mental state and capabilities at that particular point of time.
Let us talk about the people that we come across daily. It depends on us individually to whom with we choose to interact or undenying of the probablity of some of us who would also speak with nearly every person that they will come across.
In either case, we do notice the person that we come across and willingly or unwillingly, consciously or unconsciously, we 'OPINE' about the person. This opinion could be negative, positive or neutral, but we will opine about the person is for sure.
Similar is the case with the people whom we know and are part of our lives. .
the only difference dat arises is that the people whom we know, the act of opining occurs to a much larger extent, viz, we opine about the their behavior, actions, reactions, working, thoughts, postures, jestures, appearance, thought process et cetera et cetera. .
Now if i talk bout the situations and circumstances, we form an opinion about them too...
So, we opine about almost everything in our lives. .
This process doesn't come to an end here!
Once the opinion is formed, the post opinion-formation process follows and takes the charge. This process is nothing but pondering upon the opinion and the beginning of interrogations.
This varies as to the person who is the victim of opining is either known or unknown. If he is unknown, the post process is carried out inside ourselves. We mull over it that why is someone like this, why can't he be someone like that, how can he live like this, what if he lived like that and on n on n on. . .
And, if he is known (God Bless him), the post process is carried out shooting it to the concerning person seeking responses (less explainations more!!)
The intensity of the post process varies with the same criterion (known-unknown) and also by the Match/Mismatch phenomenon! The intensity of the post process is goverened by "Match/Mismatch phenomenon" and is also directly proportional to it!!
If the opinion formed matches to that of our perceptions an perspectives, the intensity of the post process is low and formidably, if it mismatches, the intensity grows higher and higher as per the call of situation. . .
The ramifications influence either the victim, the host (us), or both.
I stated all of this continous process to bring about a derivation. I derive that the cause was opinion that actually distorted all the angles.
One who acts n behaves in a particular manner is justifiable to himself (be it known/unknown to us) because, it's his own life to live and to decide for himself in the first place. He is not bound to be answerable to us or to anyone for that matter unless his decisions influence or alter someone else's decisions or life. Secondly, this distortion of angles doesn't get us anywhere other than distortion as it distorts our angles, we eventually influence others to distort their angles and goes on n on. . If the person is unknown, we'd rather shun from him and if the person is known we'd compare, contrast, n try to bring about the change. We don't realize that even if the person is known to us and subsequently ought to be answerable to us, owns and deserves complete liberty to live and take decisions of his own and OBVIOUSLY on his own. He has full right to his personal space that we must forbid ourselves to intervene or tresspass into. If even we know that we are right and the other person may suffer, we must let him suffer. A human learns from his mistakes and if he doesn't then it's his own fate that Can't be altered.
It may be possible too that the person is right but seems to be wrong to us just because his approach is absolutely opposite (n contradictory!) to that of ours.
All this was bout negative opinions and if I talk about positive opinions, they too could result into sub parts and their sub parts which if I get into trust me yu ppl will sleep on the desktop!
All i want to iterate is, opining is not at all bad or wrong, but, opining about nearly everything in life, followed by the post opining process is somewhere detrimental. We should take it easy on us as well as others, least, we ought to try to. If even it doesn't do something good to us, so be it, however, it neither does some bad to us. This also doesnt imply that we shoudn't be forming opinions at all, what's important is to decide that what's worth opning, upto how much an extent we opine about things and how da post process influences us and the others.
"Try and live life easy and let pass easily is the true essence of a healthy living. It ain't necessary that there has to be a reason or cause for everything in life."
Panorama is the broad overview of things that keeps alive the possibility of different approaches to the same destiny. Perception of this panorama actually broadens the gateway to the wide understanding of complex and bizzare situations. This wide and better understanding actually decides our perspectives towards ourselves and others in life. These perspectives then ultimately lead us to build an acumen based upon perspicacity.
(I hope i made myself clear through this piece.
Pl pardon me if i missed something or if the description was faulty somwhere.
I'm all open to suggestions and comments.)
